HealthMan Keith Torkelson MS Pathology
Tuesday, November 10, 2026
Monday, November 9, 2026
Prevent Youth Slippage by Keith Torkelson MS, BS
Contents
- Requirements
- Prosocial behavior - Social Behavior Questionnaire Scales I
- Address Adaptive Behaviors
- How things came to be and are…
- Social Behavior Questionnaire Scales - SBQ-T, SBQ-M
- Aggression-Disruptiveness (13 items)
- Anxiety (6 items)
- Prosocial behavior (10 items)
- Social Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ) II
- Divine Writer Hypothesis
- Tangent - What is Glorious Purpose?
- FYI - The Divine Timeline
- How many human beings are in the mix?
- Now (2026) number born = 117 Billion (Homo sapiens like)
Prosocial behavior - Social Behavior Questionnaire Scales I
The Social
Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ) is a
well-established behavioral assessment tool originally developed by Richard E.
Tremblay and colleagues to evaluate social, emotional, and behavioral
functioning in children and
adolescents across different environments
(such as home and school). When examining the SBQ in the context of SBQ-T and SBQ-M,
these designations refer to the specific informant or
respondent forms used to collect ratings:
SBQ-T
(Teacher Report Form):
Completed by a
teacher to assess a child's
or student's behavior within the school/classroom setting (e.g., peer interactions,
attention, or disruptive conduct).
SBQ-M
(Mother / Maternal Report Form):
Completed by
the mother or primary female
caregiver to rate the child's behavior and emotional patterns within
the home and family environment.
Core Structure of the SBQ
Original
Item Pool (Tremblay et al.):
Typically
consists of 38 items combining items from earlier behavioral inventories (such as the
Preschool Behavior Questionnaire) and prosocial measures:
28
behavior-problem and emotional items
10
prosocial behavior items
Factor
Structure:
Research (such
as longitudinal population studies like the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child
Development) generally identifies a robust multi-factor model covering domains
such as:
Disruptive
behaviors / Aggression / Hyperactivity
Emotional
distress / Anxious symptoms
Inattention
/ Withdrawal
Prosocial
behaviors (e.g., helping,
sharing, comforting)
Peer
relationship difficulties
Note:
In clinical literature, the acronym SBQ
is sometimes also used separately for the Social Behavior
Questionnaire measuring safety
behaviors in Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) (a
self-report scale focused on anxiety-driven
avoidance and monitoring) or the Sedentary
Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ) tracking sitting time.
However, in developmental and child psychology research, SBQ-T
and SBQ-M specifically
denote Teacher versus Mother informant ratings on the
Tremblay Social Behavior Questionnaire.
FAQ – Is one antisocial incidence per category enough cause to think there is problem?
Address Adaptive Behaviors
Adaptive behavior
refers to the
collection of conceptual, social, and practical life skills that people learn and perform independently to
meet the everyday demands of their environment.
Unlike intelligence (IQ), which measures cognitive potential, adaptive behavior
measures real-world functional
competence.
Core Domains
of Adaptive Behavior
Adaptive skills
are generally divided into three main categories:
Conceptual
Skills:
Literacy,
self-direction, and an understanding of numbers, money, time, and functional
communication.
Social
Skills:
Interpersonal
interactions, social responsibility, self-esteem, following rules, obeying
laws, and avoiding victimization.
Practical
Skills:
Activities of
daily living (such as personal care and hygiene), occupational tasks, safety,
health care, travel, and managing routines.
Why
It Matters
Independent
Living:
These skills
allow individuals to function safely
and effectively at home, school, and work.
Clinical
and Educational Diagnostics:
Assessments of
adaptive behavior are required alongside IQ tests to diagnose conditions like
intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorder.
Life
Changes:
Adaptive
skills evolve as society changes—such as learning
to navigate digital technology or smartphones instead of old systems.
Common
Assessment Tools
Clinicians,
educators, and psychologists measure adaptive behavior through structured
interviews and standardized rating scales completed by parents, teachers, or
caregivers:
Vineland
Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS)
Adaptive
Behavior Assessment System (ABAS)
Scales
of Independent Behavior-Revised (SIB-R)
You
can read more about definitions and criteria through the American
Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD)
or explore the breakdown on Wikipedia.
Divine Writer Hypothesis – At the
End
How things came to be and are…
Promotion - Population Reference
Bureau (PRB)
Second cycle of elementary School (9-12 years old)
Number of Items is associated with relative weight
All items except prosocial behavior are not beneficial
Buster scores Keith Edward
Target Kids and TAYs
Hyperactivity (2 items)
- 1 Restless. Runs about or jumps up and down. Doesn't keep still
- 2 Squirmy, fidgety child
Fighting (3 items)
- 1 Fights with other children
- 2 Bullies other children
- 3 Kicks, bites, or hits other children
Opposition (5 items)
- 1 Doesn't share material used for a task in the classroom
- 2 Irritable, quick to "fly off the handle"
- 3 Is disobedient
- 4 Blames others
- 5 Inconsiderate of others
Inattention (4 items)
- 1 Has poor concentration or short attention span
- 2 Inattentive
- 3 Gives up easily
- 4 Stares into space
Antisocial behavior (3 items)
- 1 Truants from school
- 2 Tells lies
- 3 Has stolen things on one or more occasions
FAQ – Is one incidence of asocial
behavior enough?
Note: Elementary Citizenship (Per
teachers satisfactory and a few outstanding)
Proactive aggression (3 items)
- 1 He gets other kids to gang up on a peer that he does not like
- 2 Uses physical force (or threatens to use force) in order to dominate other kids
- 3 Threatens or bullies others in order to get his own way
Reactive aggression (3 items)
- 1 Always claims that other children are to blame in a fight and feels that they started the whole trouble
- 2 When he has been teased or threatened, he gets angry easily and strikes back
- 3 When a peer accidentally hurts him (such as by bumping into him) he assumes that the peer meant do it, and then overreacts with anger and fighting
Social Behavior
Questionnaire (SBQ) II
The Social Behavior
Questionnaire (SBQ) is a psychometric
assessment tool used primarily in two distinct clinical and
developmental contexts: measuring anxiety-driven
safety behaviors in social anxiety disorder, or evaluating child and adolescent behavioral development
(often divided into teacher/maternal ratings like SBQ-T for Teacher and SBQ-M
for Maternal/Parent report).
1. Social Behavior
Questionnaire (SBQ) for Social Anxiety (Safety Behaviors)
In cognitive-behavioral therapy
(CBT) and research on social anxiety
disorder (SAD), the SBQ assesses the frequency of safety
behaviors (avoidance, mental monitoring, and concealment) used before
or during feared social situations.
Purpose:
Measures how
often individuals engage in covert or
overt actions to prevent negative evaluation or manage anxiety (e.g.,
avoiding eye contact, rehearsing speech, gripping cups tightly, using alcohol, or monitoring
self-presentation).
Format:
Typically a
24- to 28-item self-report questionnaire.
Rating Scale:
4-point Likert-style
frequency scale (Always, Often, Sometimes, Never).
Use:
Baseline
assessment, treatment planning, and tracking progress during exposure therapy.
You can review sample items via the Social Behavior Questionnaire Database Profile or a Social Phobia Assessment Summary.
2. Social Behavior
Questionnaire (SBQ) in Child Development (SBQ-T / SBQ-M)
In developmental psychology and
longitudinal studies (such as the Québec Longitudinal Study of Child
Development), the SBQ evaluates child and youth behavioral and emotional
functioning from early childhood
through adolescence.
SBQ-T (Teacher Report)
& SBQ-M (Maternal / Parent Report):
Refers to the
same core behavioral item set rated by different informants (teachers observing
in school vs. mothers/parents observing at home) across different developmental
stages.
Core Subscales / Factor
Structure:
Validated
models typically confirm a six-factor structure:
Emotional Distress /
Fearlessness / Anxiety
Withdrawal (e.g., refusing to talk, social withdrawal)
Impulsive / Hyperactive /
Inattentive (ADHD-related behaviors like not
keeping still, running about, acting without thinking)
Disruptive /
Externalizing Behaviors (conduct problems)
Prosocial Behaviors (helping, comforting, sharing, trying to stop quarrels)
Peer Relationship Difficulties (being teased, peer conflict)
Rating Scale:
Usually a 4-
or 5-point frequency scale
(ranging from never to very often / always).
Divine Writer Hypothesis
The Divine Writer (or Divine Author) Hypothesis
refers to a
group of theological and philosophical theories proposing that a sacred text—or
by extension, the universe and history itself—is decisively authored, governed,
or structured by an omniscient and omnipotent deity.
In modern philosophy of religion and biblical hermeneutics, this hypothesis is
evaluated through two primary frameworks: Scriptural
Evidentialism (assessing the textual features
expected from a divine source) and the Metaphysical
Authorial Analogy (viewing God as the creative writer of reality).
1. Scriptural Evaluation: H_{D}
vs. H_{H}
Philosophers
often pit the Robust Divine Authorship
Hypothesis (H_{D}) against the Ordinary Historical-Human Authorship Hypothesis (H_{H})
to evaluate the origin of religious texts like the Bible:
The Robust Divine Hypothesis (H_{D}):
Assumes an
omniscient, omnipotent, and compassion-oriented deity governs the text's core message. Because a
compassionate God prefers to reduce
avoidable human suffering, H_{D}predicts
that a divine text intended to guide human life would include compact,
advanced, and unambiguous practical guidance (such as basic biomedical or
sanitation protocols) ahead of its time.
The Historical-Human Hypothesis (H_{H}):
Views the text
as a layered anthology produced, edited, and transmitted by human agents. Its
practical, ethical, and scientific horizons are strictly constrained by the
localized knowledge, genres, and cultural priorities of ancient Near Eastern
communities.
This
friction creates what philosophers call an "expectation
gap." Critics of strict divine authorship argue
that the lack of advanced scientific or moral foresight in ancient texts makes (H_{H})
a more statistically probable
explanation than a robust, suffering-averse H_{D}.
2.
Models of Divine Textual Governance
Theologians who maintain a divine origin theory generally reject the idea that a text must either be perfectly dictated by God or purely human. Instead, they apply three distinct models of authorship:
3. The Metaphysical Analogy:
God as the Cosmic Writer
Beyond
scriptural origins, the "Divine Writer" concept is used as a tool to
describe the God-world relationship.
In this philosophical analogy, history is a narrative and God is the ultimate
cosmic author. However, this framework faces significant challenges regarding
the problem of evil:
The Problem of Gratuitous Evil:
If God is the
absolute author of the universe's timeline, why would He intentionally
"write in" vast, purposeless
human suffering, tragedies, and atrocities into the script?
The Author of Evil:
Critics argue
that an unrestricted authorial analogy strips human beings of free will and
inadvertently makes God the direct author and manipulator of moral evil.
Divine Hiddenness:
The analogy
struggles to explain the "absentee author"—why the creator of the
narrative remains silent or hidden when the characters within the story are
suffering.
Tangent - What is Glorious Purpose?
In the Marvel Cinematic Universe
(MCU), the phrase "glorious purpose"
refers to Loki’s obsessive search
for personal destiny, power, and validation, which transforms completely over
the course of his story.
The
Evolution of Loki's Purpose
The
Selfish Pursuit of Power:
Loki first
famously utters the phrase ("I am Loki
of Asgard, and I am burdened with glorious purpose") in The Avengers while trying to conquer Earth. At this stage, his
"purpose" is purely narcissistic—a delusion that he is pre-ordained
to rule over others, strip away free will, and claim a throne.
The
Reality Check:
Through his
journey in the Disney+ series Loki, his illusions are systematically broken down by the Time
Variance Authority (TVA) and variants like Sylvie. He learns that his old path
only leads to failure, loss, and pain.
Selfless
Sacrifice:
In the series
finale, Loki redefines the phrase. Instead of conquering a throne to be served,
he assumes a heavy, solitary burden—holding
and protecting the dying multiverse of timelines together so that
others can live. His "glorious purpose" shifts from empty tyranny to
the ultimate act of self-sacrifice.
FYI - The Divine Timeline
Divine timing
refers to the
belief that the universe or God
orchestrates events according to a purposeful, orderly plan rather than
a random human schedule.
Core Concepts
Sovereignty
and Order:
Rooted in
theological traditions, it holds that historical and personal events unfold at
the exact right moment (pleroma kronu, or
the full measure of time).
Active
Alignment vs. Passive Waiting:
In spiritual
and manifestation contexts, divine timing is viewed as an energetic frequency or readiness rather than an excuse for
inaction. It emphasizes inner preparation (patience and clarity) meeting
external opportunity.
Biblical
Chronology:
Tools like Divine Timeline map out historical and biblical figures from ancient times (such
as Elijah or Jonah) through early Christian history.
Pattern-Based
History:
Theological
frameworks often view history through a structured lens, such as the 6-day work
and 1-day Sabbath pattern scaling into 6,000 years of human history followed by
a millennial rest.
How many human beings are in the mix?
The current (2026) global human
population is approximately 8.3
billion people.
The "7%" figure in your premise refers to the percentage of all human
beings who have ever lived
that are alive at that moment. With the population increase over the last
decade, that ratio has shifted slightly.
While the raw number of people
has grown by roughly 700 to 800 million since 2017, the overall percentage of
"all humans ever born" stays remarkably close to 7%. This is because
the total estimated number of historical humans who have ever lived (stretching back roughly 200,000 years) is
also massive—currently estimated at over 117 billion people.
Now (2026) number born = 117 Billion (Homo sapiens like)
Approximately 117
billion
members of the human species have ever been born on Earth, according to updated
estimates from the Population
Reference Bureau.
Key Details
Historical
Estimate:
The older 2011
estimate frequently cited was around 108 billion humans starting from roughly
50,000 or 190,000 BCE.
Updated
Count:
Newer
calculations (such as those by the PRB and discussed in Scientific American) place the total closer to 117 billion people (2026).
Current
Population Share:
With global
population surpassing 8 billion, roughly 7% of all human beings who have ever
lived are alive today.
Entertaining Mistaken Beliefs
- Aside – Hypothesis – Dead people write scripts for the living.
- Aside – Hypothesis – Some people leave Earth space-time.
- Aside – Hypothesis – San Francisco is the Earth exodus point.
Assessment Centered on Brand New Day by Keith Torkelson MS, BS VHealth
Contents
- Requirements
- Quality Assurance Update – Clinical Quality Measure – Acronyms
- FYI - Measure Sources – For CMS Stars Ratings (Slide 10)
- Calculation
- Assessing Quality Of Life (QOL)
- QOL Screener Results - Quality Of Life (QOL-BND-15 Item)
- Consumer Rated Satisfaction Survey(s) – BND & OCHCA
- Consumer Rated Satisfaction Survey(s) – Sample Results (26 Items)
- Planning and Assessment
- Risk Management – General
- Inventory - Risk Management - Condition Specific
- Completing the Inventory - Process Indicators
- Hot Off the Press – Capturing the Consumer Experience
Translating Legacy GAF Scores to SOFAS
Calculations
Reviewing Assessment Conversion Factors (ACFs) – Just for Fun
55.0-GAFS * 0.95-SOFAS / GAFS = 52.3 SOFAS (%)
65.0-QOLS * 0.87-ProQOLS / QOLs = 56.6 ProQOLS (%)
77.0-WHOQOL-BREF * 0.80-ProQOLS / 1 WHOQOL-BREF = 61.6 ProQOLs (%)
Assessment Results for Keith Torkelson, M.Sci.
High Resolution Longitudinal Process Measures for Quality of Life (QOL-15)
Last Update: 20261109-M: QOL Reporting.
BL = Baseline | RT = Real Time | Ӿ = Average
Discover the Tools - These are process measures for consumer Satisfaction
Last Reviewed: 20170802-W: BND Satisfaction Surveys are received direct From Corporate
BND measures Contributes to the CMS assigned annual Stars Score
Consumer Rated Satisfaction Survey(s) – Sample Results (26 Items)
Last Reviewed: 20170908-F: Satisfaction Results
Assessment Received Direct From Corporate
Inventory - Planning Documents
By elimination these are all Process Measures
Last Reviewed: 20170730-SUN: Brand New Day Planning Documents
All Administered by BND Corporate – Received by US Mail
Last Reviewed: 20170714-F:
Brand New Day’s Health Risk Assessment (HRA) Devolution.
Inventory - Risk Management - Condition Specific
Last Reviewed: 20170714-F:
CMP = Care Management Program | RNR = Results Not Returned | RND = Results Not Discussed
Hot Off the Press – Capturing the Consumer Experience
Buster rates others
Source File: Email_17072101_SPHA CAHPS MIPS
Member Experience Evaluation (MEE-MSG 12 Derived Screener)
Last Reviewed: 20170725-TU: Expect Little Improvement about Next Appointment
We were wrong because we were assigned a different practitioner (Physician Assistant Substitute or PAS).
“The core survey includes 80 questions broken out by the following 12 Summary Survey Measures”
Housing Priority Indicators Measurement by KE Torkelson MS Et.al. (2026) VHealth
Contents
- Requirements
- Legend
- Assessments for use by the Housing Advisory Board
- Results up Front
- Interpretation
- Images
- Basics Sleep, Peace and Harmony
- Shanks Truck Stop sharing with Theodore Francis (TF)
- Indications of a Good House (12 Items) – Shanks Truck Stop
- Harvest Retirement sharing with John Baer (JB) – Interim
- Housing Centered Primary Priority Indicators – Interim
- Harvest Retirement sharing with Solo
- Buster rates current arrangement centered about Solo
Legend
JB = John Baer
H&HS = Health & Human Services
HSF = High Scores are Favorable
LA = Living Arrangements
QSM = Quick Score Method
RT = Real Time
SW = Share (d) With
TF = Theodore “Ted” Francis
Housing Solutions Bundle - For Housing Advisory Board Element (HAB)
Buster rates past and current arrangement
Housing Solutions Bundle - For Housing Advisory Board Element (HAB)
Buster rates past and current arrangement
Indications of a Good House (12 Items) (HSF)
Results up Front
Interpretation
>All values seem to stand the test of time except July 10, 2023 82.5% is substantially too high. It was miserable sharing with Ted. Ted was a bully. We tried our best to stay away from home to give him space to recover. In November of 2023 Ted was admitted to Global’s Psych Ward. We visited him. They released him with ineffective medication. He was showing signs of psychosis. He interfered with Buster’s sleep. In January of 2024 Buster had to go to the Psych Ward. In 2024 Ted was reported dead. In 2025, JB or John Baer was a great roommate and an excellent match for Buster. Unfortunately JB died. Buster lived with Doug A. Rochwell yet Doug had sleeping issues and would moan loudly. Buster has been living solo for a few months now. The roommate uncertainty wears on Buster.
Basics Sleep, Peace and Harmony
Achieving deep sleep, inner peace, and mental harmony relies on combining solid biological sleep hygiene with mindfulness practices that quiet an overactive mind. Balancing your physical routine with mental relaxation helps transition the nervous system from daytime stress into a restorative state of rest.
The Biological Basics of Sleep
To cultivate harmony, it helps to understand what your body requires for optimal recovery:
Duration:
Most adults require between 7 and 8 hours of continuous sleep per night.
Sleep Architecture:
A healthy night's sleep is ideally split into distinct cycles, with roughly 25% spent in deep sleep (for physical recovery) and 25% in REM sleep (for mental and emotional processing).
Health Benefits:
Proper sleep actively strengthens your immune system, flushes out metabolic waste, deletes irrelevant sensory data, and integrates new learning.
Mental Alignment:
Cultivating Peace & Harmony
If stress or overthinking keeps you awake, sound and mindfulness techniques can shift your brainwaves into a sleep-ready state:
Binaural Beats:
Listening to low-frequency tones—specifically Delta waves (around 2.2Hz to 3.2Hz)—promotes brainwave entrainment, mimicking the deepest stages of natural sleep to reduce acute anxiety.
Solfeggio Frequencies:
Frequencies like 528Hz are traditionally utilized in relaxation soundscapes to encourage mental clarity, deep inner peace, and cellular harmony.
Guided Visualizations:
Mentally walking through a cool, damp, ancient forest or resting in a quiet field helps anchor your focus on the present moment, systematically releasing physical tension from your shoulders, neck, and mind.
Optimizing Your Sleep Environment
Your physical surroundings act as the final cue to your brain that it is safe to let go of the day:
Dim the Lights:
Eliminate smartphones, tablets, and computers at least one hour before bedtime to prevent blue light from suppressing your natural melatonin production.
Set the Climate:
Keep your bedroom cool, clean, and well-ventilated to assist the body's natural temperature drop during sleep.
Sensory Tools:
Consider combining ambient noise with a contoured sleep mask or utilizing calming scents like natural lavender to mask environmental distractions.
Shanks Truck Stop sharing with Theodore Francis (TF)
In Room Priority Indicators
For Housing Advisory Board Element (HAB)
Rated by and for Buster
Good Bed - Room Indicators Score (12 Items) (HSF)
Last Reviewed: 20230717-M: M6ON-A Day: QSM = Quick Score Method
Indications of a Good House (12 Items) – Shanks Truck Stop
Housing Centered Primary Priority Indicators
In and About Home Priority Indicators – Screener 12
For Housing Advisory Board Element (HAB)
Rated by and for Buster
Last Reviewed: 20230717-M: M6ON-A Day: QSM = Quick Score Method
Harvest Retirement sharing with John Baer (JB) - Interim
In Room Priority Indicators
For Housing Advisory Board Element (HAB)
Rated by and for Buster
Housing Centered Primary Priority Indicators - Interim
In and About Home Priority Indicators – Screener 12
For Housing Advisory Board Element (HAB)
Harvest Retirement sharing with Solo
In Room Priority Indicators
For Housing Advisory Board Element (HAB)
Buster rates current arrangement
Buster rates current arrangement centered about Solo
Housing Centered Primary Priority Indicators
In and About Home Priority Indicators – Screener 12
For Housing Advisory Board Element (HAB)





































